CVE-2026-48721
Published: 24 June 2026
Summary
CVE-2026-48721 is a high-severity Incorrect Behavior Order: Validate Before Canonicalize (CWE-180) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 8.6 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 4.1th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-39016
Vulnerability details
Warp is an agentic development environment. From 0.2025.10.08.08.12.stable_00 until 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01, Warp contains a command execution permission-check bypass in the default unsandboxed CLI agent profile. The CLI profile is non-interactive and relies on a command denylist as a safety boundary for…
more
commands that should require confirmation. Because command strings were checked before canonicalizing leading environment-variable assignments, an attacker who can influence the agent's command output may cause denylisted commands to be treated as non-denylisted. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.2026.05.06.15.42.stable_01.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Why these techniques?
Bypass of command denylist safety boundary directly enables exploitation of the application to run unauthorized commands.
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Implements a reliable, tamperproof protection mechanism whose completeness can be assured.
Procedures for training on protection mechanisms reduce the chance of protection mechanism failures being present or exploitable.
Documented procedures to implement assessment, authorization, and monitoring controls prevent these protection mechanisms from failing due to undefined processes.
Direct evaluation of whether controls produce desired security outcomes detects protection mechanism failures and enables remediation.
Requires assessment that protection mechanisms are correctly implemented and producing intended security outcomes.
The POA&M process ensures identified weaknesses in protection mechanisms are documented and scheduled for remediation, reducing the duration they remain exploitable.
Ongoing control assessments and analysis of monitoring data enable timely detection and response when protection mechanisms fail.
Impact analysis identifies changes that could weaken or disable existing protection mechanisms.