Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NSummary
CVE-2026-54562 is a medium-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 16th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-44687
Vulnerability Data
Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. Prior to 4.16.1, Cloudreve's remote download workflow accepts user-supplied URLs at POST /api/v4/workflow/download and passes them to the configured downloader without blocking loopback, localhost, IPv6 localhost, or redirect-to-loopback targets, allowing a…
more
non-admin user with remote download permission to fetch internal-only URLs and read the response after it is imported into the user's own files. This issue is fixed in version 4.16.1.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Why these techniques?
SSRF in public-facing remote download endpoint enables internal network probing (T1046) and exploitation of the application for unauthorized internal access (T1190).
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Enforces information flow policies that can explicitly block user-supplied URLs targeting loopback, localhost, or internal-only addresses in the remote download workflow.
Requires validation of all user-supplied input (POST /api/v4/workflow/download URLs) to reject loopback, IPv6 localhost, and redirect-to-internal targets before the downloader is invoked.
Boundary protection mechanisms can be configured to deny or filter outbound connections from the application to internal-only or loopback destinations.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.
Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.
Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.
Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.