Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-55429

Access Control in Coder ≤ 2.29.17

Published
08 July 2026
Modified
08 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0029 21th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-55429 is a high-severity Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) vulnerability in Coder Coder. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 21th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, `UpsertWorkspaceApp` overwrites an existing app's `agent_id` on a primary-key conflict and `insertAgentApp` accepts the app ID from the provisioner's `CompleteJob` payload without…

more

verifying it belongs to the workspace being built. `CompleteJob` runs under `dbauthz.AsProvisionerd` so the authorization layer does not block the cross-workspace upsert. Exploitation requires elevated access as a template author or external provisioner operator. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 verifies that any existing `workspace_apps` row matching the supplied ID belongs to the workspace being built and rejects cross-workspace agent reassignment. No known workarounds are available.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Why these techniques?

The vulnerability allows an attacker with template author or provisioner operator access to reassign workspace apps across workspaces via the UpsertWorkspaceApp and insertAgentApp functions during CompleteJob execution. This enables unauthorized modification of workspace resources, which aligns with T1190 (Exploit Public-Facing Application) as the flaw is in a remotely accessible API endpoint handling workspace provisioning.

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-55079Same product: Coder Coder
CVE-2026-55432Same product: Coder Coder
CVE-2026-45796Same product: Coder Coder
CVE-2026-55438Same product: Coder Coder
CVE-2026-55430Same product: Coder Coder
CVE-2026-55076Same product: Coder Coder
CVE-2026-46354Same product: Coder Coder
CVE-2026-55075Same product: Coder Coder
CVE-2026-55431Same product: Coder Coder
CVE-2026-44454Same product: Coder Coder

Affected Assets

coder
coder
≤ 2.29.17 · 2.30.0 — 2.32.7 · 2.33.0 — 2.33.8

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

AC-3 enforces that every access decision (including the UpsertWorkspaceApp / insertAgentApp path) is evaluated against the caller's authorization context, directly blocking the cross-workspace agent reassignment that bypasses dbauthz.AsProvisionerd.

prevent

AC-6 restricts the provisioner operator and template-author roles to the minimum privileges required, preventing them from performing UpsertWorkspaceApp operations that affect workspaces outside their authorized scope.

prevent

SI-10 requires validation of all inputs to CompleteJob; adding a check that the supplied app ID belongs to the workspace being built would have rejected the malicious cross-workspace upsert before the primary-key conflict overwrite occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 full match
prevents

Enforcing authorization policy and least privilege directly blocks user-controlled key tampering that bypasses access checks.

PR.IR-01 mostly match
prevents

Logical access controls prevent unauthorized data access that results from missing authorization checks on object references.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can detect missing authorization checks but does not prevent the weakness in production.

prevents

Information access restriction explicitly enforces that users may only retrieve data they are authorized to see, directly addressing user-controlled key bypass.

prevents

Access control policy directly requires enforcement of authorization rules that prevent unauthorized access via manipulated keys.

prevents

Managing access rights includes ensuring users can only access their own records and not bypass authorization by altering identifiers.

mitigates

Privileged access rights control restricts what data each user may access, mitigating direct object reference attacks.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes authorization design but does not itself implement runtime access checks.

References