Cyber Resilience

CVE-2019-25307

Public PoC
Published
11 February 2026
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 8.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0015 4th percentile
Risk Priority 31 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2019-25307 is a high-severity Unquoted Search Path or Element (CWE-428) vulnerability in Tucows (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked at the 4th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2019-25307 is an unquoted service path vulnerability affecting WorkgroupMail 7.5.1, specifically in its Windows service configuration. This flaw, classified under CWE-428, arises from the service binary path not being properly quoted, enabling local privilege escalation. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability with low complexity and local access requirements.

Local attackers with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability by placing a malicious executable in a directory that precedes the legitimate service binary in the system's PATH search order. During service startup, the malicious executable runs with LocalSystem privileges, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution, full system compromise, and persistence on the affected Windows host.

Advisories and resources, including those from VulnCheck and an Exploit-DB entry (47523), document the issue and provide proof-of-concept exploitation details. No specific patches or mitigations are detailed in the available references, but practitioners should verify service path configurations in WorkgroupMail installations and apply general unquoted path hardening, such as quoting paths or restricting service directories.

A public exploit is available on Exploit-DB, indicating proof-of-concept exploitation capability, though no widespread real-world attacks have been reported in the provided data.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

WorkgroupMail 7.5.1 contains an unquoted service path vulnerability in its Windows service configuration that allows local attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code. Attackers can exploit the unquoted binary path to inject malicious executables that will be run with LocalSystem privileges…

more

during service startup.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2016-20057Shared CWE-428
CVE-2025-10199Shared CWE-428
CVE-2024-22437Shared CWE-428
CVE-2026-25866Shared CWE-428
CVE-2020-37223Shared CWE-428
CVE-2020-37230Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-53984Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-24671Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-2331Shared CWE-428
CVE-2019-25308Shared CWE-428

Affected Assets

Tucows
—
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover unquoted search paths through static analysis or dynamic test cases.

Documented development standards and tools can mandate proper quoting and escaping of path elements.

Engineering principles can require safe construction and quoting of search paths and command elements.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent path-handling flaws such as unquoted elements during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect unquoted search-path issues before deployment.

degrades

Enforcing controlled software installation can prevent unquoted search-path elements in executables and scripts.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle practices include input validation and path handling that reduce unquoted search-path weaknesses.

degrades

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require safe path construction and quoting conventions.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly mandate quoting search paths and avoiding unsafe path construction.

degrades

Change-management processes can enforce review of path-handling changes that might introduce unquoted elements.

References