Cyber Resilience

CVE-2019-25487

Access Control

Public PoCAccess Control
Published
11 March 2026
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 9.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.079 94th percentile
Risk Priority 54 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2019-25487 is a critical-severity Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 9.3 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 6% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-24 (Access Control Decisions) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2019-25487 is a remote command execution vulnerability affecting the SAPIDO RB-1732 router on firmware version V2.0.43. The issue arises in the formSysCmd endpoint, where unauthenticated attackers can submit malicious input through POST requests containing shell commands in the sysCmd parameter, leading to arbitrary system command execution on the device.

Unauthenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network with low attack complexity and no privileges or user interaction required, earning it a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Successful exploitation allows attackers to execute code with router privileges, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the device.

Advisories referenced in VulnCheck and an Exploit-DB entry (exploit 47031) describe the vulnerability and proof-of-concept exploitation details. No specific patches or mitigation guidance is detailed in the provided information.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

SAPIDO RB-1732 V2.0.43 contains a remote command execution vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by submitting malicious input to the formSysCmd endpoint. Attackers can send POST requests with the sysCmd parameter containing shell commands to execute…

more

code on the device with router privileges.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-13175Shared CWE-639
CVE-2025-13389Shared CWE-639
CVE-2026-25782Shared CWE-639
CVE-2026-28696Shared CWE-639
CVE-2024-47316Shared CWE-639
CVE-2024-2261Shared CWE-639
CVE-2025-61876Shared CWE-639
CVE-2026-22409Shared CWE-639
CVE-2026-12433Shared CWE-639
CVE-2026-72690Shared CWE-639

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforcing approved authorizations on every access request structurally stops a user-controlled key from reaching another user's data.

Requiring explicit access-control decisions on each request blocks unauthorized key-driven access.

Least-privilege restrictions limit the scope of data reachable even if a key check is bypassed.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 full match
prevents

Enforcing authorization policy and least privilege directly blocks user-controlled key tampering that bypasses access checks.

PR.IR-01 mostly match
prevents

Logical access controls prevent unauthorized data access that results from missing authorization checks on object references.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing authorization checks but does not prevent the weakness in production.

prevents

Information access restriction explicitly enforces that users may only retrieve data they are authorized to see, directly addressing user-controlled key bypass.

prevents

Access control policy directly requires enforcement of authorization rules that prevent unauthorized access via manipulated keys.

prevents

Managing access rights includes ensuring users can only access their own records and not bypass authorization by altering identifiers.

mitigates

Privileged access rights control restricts what data each user may access, mitigating direct object reference attacks.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes authorization design but does not itself implement runtime access checks.

References