Cyber Resilience

CVE-2021-21017

Memory Safety in Adobe Acrobat 17.0 – 17.011.30188

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedMemory Safety
Published
11 February 2021
Modified
23 October 2025
KEV Added
03 November 2021
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.86 99.7th percentile
Risk Priority 90 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2021-21017 is a high-severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 0.3% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Acrobat Reader DC versions 2020.013.20074 and earlier, 2020.001.30018 and earlier, and 2017.011.30188 and earlier contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability tracked as CVE-2021-21017 and associated with CWE-122 and CWE-787. The flaw resides in the PDF handling components of these releases and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8.

An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the issue by supplying a malicious file that triggers the overflow when opened, resulting in arbitrary code execution under the privileges of the current user. Successful exploitation therefore requires the victim to interact with the crafted document, typically delivered via email or a web page.

Adobe has published remediation guidance in security bulletin APSB21-09, and the vulnerability appears in CISA’s catalog of known exploited vulnerabilities, confirming observed in-the-wild use.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Acrobat Reader DC versions versions 2020.013.20074 (and earlier), 2020.001.30018 (and earlier) and 2017.011.30188 (and earlier) are affected by a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker could leverage this vulnerability to achieve arbitrary code execution in the context of the…

more

current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
03 November 2021

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1211 Exploitation for Stealth Stealth
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities to evade detection by hiding activity, suppressing logging, or operating within trusted or unmonitored components.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-26369Same product: Adobe Acrobatboth on KEV
CVE-2010-2883Same product: Adobe Acrobatboth on KEV
CVE-2023-38231Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-22242Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-38233Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2024-20727Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-21609Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-26395Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-21606Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2024-20728Same product: Adobe Acrobat

Affected Assets

adobe
acrobat
17.0 — 17.011.30188 · 20.0 — 20.001.30018
adobe
acrobat dc
≤ 20.013.20074
adobe
acrobat reader
17.0 — 17.011.30188 · 20.0 — 20.001.300183
adobe
acrobat reader dc
≤ 20.013.20074

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.1

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-787

Out-of-bounds writes that corrupt control flow or inject shellcode are rendered non-executable by the same memory protections.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 full match
prevents

Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover heap-overflow flaws but does not prevent their introduction in code.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Timely patching removes known heap-overflow instances after they exist.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect heap overflows before release.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates practices that reduce the likelihood of introducing heap overflows.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory APIs that mitigate heap overflows.

prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safety and input-validation controls that address heap overflows.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prescribe techniques (safe functions, bounds checks) that prevent heap-based buffer overflows.

prevents

Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.

References