Cyber Resilience

CVE-2021-26691

Memory Safety in Oracle Instantis Enterprisetrack 17.1 … 17.3

High EPSSMemory Safety
Published
10 June 2021
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.68 99.3th percentile
Risk Priority 97 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2021-26691 is a critical-severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) vulnerability in Oracle Instantis Enterprisetrack. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, ranked in the top 0.7% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 to 2.4.46 a specially crafted SessionHeader sent by an origin server could cause a heap overflow

CWE(s)

Related Threats

Likely ATT&CK TechniquesAI

Techniques this vulnerability likely enables, inferred from its description, weakness type, and attributed-actor tradecraft. Confidence is per-technique.

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Accessconfidence: HIGH
Heap overflow in Apache HTTP Server via crafted SessionHeader enables remote code execution against a public-facing web server.
inferred from description + CWE · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2021-44790Same product: Apache Http Server
CVE-2024-29131Same product: Fedoraproject Fedora
CVE-2023-4911Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2023-35001Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2023-2911Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2020-15999Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2023-4273Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2023-4863Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2023-2124Same product: Debian Debian Linux
CVE-2024-2961Same product: Debian Debian Linux

Affected Assets

apache
http server
2.4.0 — 2.4.46
debian
debian linux
10.0, 9.0
fedoraproject
fedora
34, 35
oracle
enterprise manager ops center
12.4.0.0
oracle
instantis enterprisetrack
17.1, 17.2, 17.3
oracle
secure backup
≤ 18.1.0.1.0
oracle
zfs storage appliance kit
8.8
netapp
cloud backup
all versions

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.1

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-787

Out-of-bounds writes that corrupt control flow or inject shellcode are rendered non-executable by the same memory protections.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 full match
prevents

Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover heap-overflow flaws but does not prevent their introduction in code.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Timely patching removes known heap-overflow instances after they exist.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect heap overflows before release.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates practices that reduce the likelihood of introducing heap overflows.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory APIs that mitigate heap overflows.

prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safety and input-validation controls that address heap overflows.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prescribe techniques (safe functions, bounds checks) that prevent heap-based buffer overflows.

prevents

Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.

References