Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-23144

Memory Safety in Gpac 2.2-rev0-gab012bbfb-master

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
20 January 2023
Modified
03 April 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0032 25th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-23144 is a medium-severity Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190) vulnerability in Gpac Gpac. Its CVSS base score is 5.5 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 25th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Integer overflow vulnerability in function Q_DecCoordOnUnitSphere file bifs/unquantize.c in GPAC version 2.2-rev0-gab012bbfb-master.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-42298Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2023-4722Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2025-55647Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2026-1416Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2026-1417Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2023-4721Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2025-25723Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2025-60468Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2024-6064Same product: Gpac Gpac
CVE-2025-55642Same product: Gpac Gpac

Affected Assets

gpac
gpac
2.2-rev0-gab012bbfb-master

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require use of safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and testing that prevent integer overflows.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development can detect integer overflows before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and arithmetic checks that prevent integer overflows.

degrades

Application security requirements include bounds checking and safe arithmetic to avoid overflow conditions.

degrades

Secure architecture principles require defensive coding patterns that mitigate integer wraparound risks.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe integer operations and mandate overflow-safe constructs.

References