Security Resilience

CVE-2024-10525

Memory Safety in Eclipse Mosquitto 1.3.2 – 2.0.19

Public PoCHigh EPSSMemory Safety
Published
30 October 2024
Modified
03 November 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.59 99.1th percentile
Risk Priority 70 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-10525 is a high-severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) vulnerability in Eclipse Mosquitto. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data Obfuscation (T1001); ranked in the top 0.9% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

In Eclipse Mosquitto versions 1.3.2 through 2.0.18, a vulnerability in the libmosquitto client library allows an out-of-bounds memory access when processing a crafted SUBACK packet that contains no reason codes. The flaw occurs inside the on_subscribe callback and directly affects the mosquitto_sub and mosquitto_rr command-line clients. It is tracked under CWE-122 and CWE-787 and carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 7.2 with high impact on integrity and availability.

An attacker who controls or can impersonate an MQTT broker can send the malicious SUBACK packet to any connecting client that uses the vulnerable library. Successful exploitation results in memory corruption on the client, which may be leveraged to alter program behavior or cause a crash without requiring user interaction or elevated privileges on the client side.

The Mosquitto project addressed the issue in version 2.0.19, with the corrective change published in commit 8ab20b4ba4204fdcdec78cb4d9f03c944a6e0e1c. Debian subsequently released updated packages through its LTS channels to back-port the fix for affected installations. The associated EPSS score has remained near 0.18 with no material increase since disclosure.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In Eclipse Mosquitto, from version 1.3.2 through 2.0.18, if a malicious broker sends a crafted SUBACK packet with no reason codes, a client using libmosquitto may make out of bounds memory access when acting in its on_subscribe callback. This affects…

more

the mosquitto_sub and mosquitto_rr clients.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001 Data Obfuscation Command And Control
Adversaries may obfuscate command and control traffic to make it more difficult to detect.
T1001.002 Steganography Command And Control
Adversaries may use steganographic techniques to hide command and control traffic to make detection efforts more difficult.
T1003.001 LSASS Memory Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credential material stored in the process memory of the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS).
T1003.002 Security Account Manager Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to extract credential material from the Security Account Manager (SAM) database either through in-memory techniques or through the Windows Registry where the SAM database is stored.
T1003.004 LSA Secrets Credential Access
Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.
T1003.006 DCSync Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credentials and other sensitive information by abusing a Windows Domain Controller's application programming interface (API)(Citation: Microsoft DRSR Dec 2017) (Citation: Microsoft GetNCCChanges) (Citati…
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-2212Same vendor: Eclipse
CVE-2025-1471Same vendor: Eclipse
CVE-2023-48695Same vendor: Eclipse
CVE-2023-7272Same vendor: Eclipse
CVE-2024-3933Same vendor: Eclipse
CVE-2023-48697Same vendor: Eclipse
CVE-2024-45306Shared CWE-122, CWE-787
CVE-2023-49600Shared CWE-122, CWE-787
CVE-2024-27372Shared CWE-122, CWE-787
CVE-2021-21017Shared CWE-122, CWE-787

Affected Assets

eclipse
mosquitto
1.3.2 — 2.0.19

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and memory-error detectors) can discover heap overflows after they have been coded.

Input validation enforces bounds checking on data written to heap buffers, directly stopping the overflow condition from being introduced.

Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.

Security engineering principles require use of memory-safe constructs and bounds-checked allocation routines that avoid introducing heap overflows.

Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability of a heap overflow to execute attacker-controlled code or corrupt adjacent structures.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

ID.RA-01 partial match
blocks

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover heap-overflow flaws but does not prevent their introduction in code.

PR.PS-02 partial match
blocks

Timely patching removes known heap-overflow instances after they exist.

PR.PS-06 partial match
blocks

Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

removes
removes
removes
removes
removes

References