Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-11862

Published
27 November 2024
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 5.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0014 4th percentile
Risk Priority 28 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-11862 is a medium-severity Covert Timing Channel (CWE-385) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 5.1 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data Obfuscation (T1001); ranked at the 4th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-31 (Covert Channel Analysis) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Non constant time cryptographic operation in Devolutions.XTS.NET 2024.11.19 and earlier allows an attacker to render half of the encryption key obsolete via a timing attacks

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001 Data Obfuscation Command And Control
Adversaries may obfuscate command and control traffic to make it more difficult to detect.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-45192Shared CWE-385
CVE-2026-6478Shared CWE-385
CVE-2024-25964Shared CWE-385
CVE-2025-9231Shared CWE-385
CVE-2025-49087Shared CWE-385
CVE-2026-5598Shared CWE-385
CVE-2024-26306Shared CWE-385
CVE-2025-66442Shared CWE-385
CVE-2025-27587Shared CWE-385
CVE-2024-13176Shared CWE-385

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Covert channel analysis directly identifies timing channels that could leak information.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices (reviews, testing) directly reduce introduction of timing-channel vulnerabilities in code.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of hardware/software behavior can detect anomalous timing patterns that indicate covert channels.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can surface timing-channel weaknesses during design or code analysis.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
degrades

Detailed logging can reveal timing anomalies but does not prevent covert timing channels.

finds

Continuous monitoring may detect timing-based exfiltration but does not eliminate the channel itself.

mitigates

Network segmentation reduces attack surface but does not address intra-process timing channels.

mitigates

Network segregation limits external timing observation but not internal covert timing.

prevents

Secure architecture principles can include timing-channel countermeasures but are not specific.

prevents

Secure coding guidelines may recommend constant-time algorithms but coverage is not guaranteed.

References