Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-21687

Atlassian Bamboo 9.0.0 – 9.0.4

Published
16 July 2024
Modified
14 March 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0075 52th percentile
Risk Priority 62 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-21687 is a high-severity PHP Remote File Inclusion (CWE-98) vulnerability in Atlassian Bamboo. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 48% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

This High severity File Inclusion vulnerability was introduced in versions 9.0.0, 9.1.0, 9.2.0, 9.3.0, 9.4.0, 9.5.0 and 9.6.0 of Bamboo Data Center and Server. This File Inclusion vulnerability, with a CVSS Score of 8.1, allows an authenticated attacker to get…

more

the application to display the contents of a local file, or execute a different files already stored locally on the server which has high impact to confidentiality, high impact to integrity, no impact to availability, and requires no user interaction. Atlassian recommends that Bamboo Data Center and Server customers upgrade to latest version, if you are unable to do so, upgrade your instance to one of the specified supported fixed versions listed on this CVE See the release notes (https://confluence.atlassian.com/bambooreleases/bamboo-release-notes-1189793869.html). You can download the latest version of Bamboo Data Center and Server from the download center (https://www.atlassian.com/software/bamboo/download-archives). This vulnerability was reported via our Bug Bounty program.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-21571Same product: Atlassian Bamboo
CVE-2026-21570Same product: Atlassian Bamboo
CVE-2024-21689Same product: Atlassian Bamboo
CVE-2023-22516Same product: Atlassian Bamboo
CVE-2025-22167Same vendor: Atlassian
CVE-2019-3398Same vendor: Atlassian
CVE-2022-26134Same vendor: Atlassian
CVE-2019-3396Same vendor: Atlassian
CVE-2024-21677Same vendor: Atlassian
CVE-2021-26084Same vendor: Atlassian

Affected Assets

atlassian
bamboo
9.0.0 — 9.0.4 · 9.1.0 — 9.1.3 · 9.2.0 — 9.2.16

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and static analysis can discover missing filename restrictions before deployment.

Validating all inputs before they reach include/require statements directly stops untrusted filenames from being used.

Enforcing access authorizations on resources limits what an included file can reach even if a bad name is supplied.

Information-flow rules can block the loading of external or unauthorized files into the PHP process.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices such as input validation and allow-listing of include paths directly prevent the weakness.

PR.PS-01 partial match
prevents

Hardened runtime configuration (e.g., allow_url_include=off) directly blocks RFI even if code is flawed.

PR.PS-05 partial match
prevents

Execution restrictions can prevent the remote payload from running, while eliminating the weakness reduces the need for such controls.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect RFI but does not prevent the weakness by itself.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and safe include/require patterns that directly prevent remote file inclusion.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection and unsafe file operations.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce attack surface but do not specifically address dynamic file inclusion.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require whitelisting and sanitization of filenames used in include/require statements.

none

Information access restriction limits what files can be read but does not address dynamic inclusion logic.

References