CVE-2025-71325
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-71325 is a critical-severity Unchecked Error Condition (CWE-391) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 9.3 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 39th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-210271
Vulnerability Data
picklescan before 0.0.27 contains a parsing logic error in the _list_globals function when handling STACK_GLOBAL opcodes, failing to track arguments in the correct range and allowing malicious pickle files to bypass detection. Attackers can craft pickle files with arguments at…
more
position zero to trigger unexpected exceptions and evade security scanning.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can identify locations where error conditions are ignored or unhandled.
Secure engineering principles require explicit handling of error conditions and exceptions during design and implementation.
Fail-to-known-state requirements limit blast radius when an unchecked error condition occurs.
Proper error handling ensures conditions produce actionable messages rather than allowing silent unexpected behavior.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices include proper exception and error handling, eliminating the root cause of CWE-391.
Requiring log generation makes ignored error conditions visible to monitoring, directly reducing the weakness impact.
Event analysis can surface consequences of unchecked errors but does not enforce error checking itself.
Runtime monitoring can detect anomalous behavior from ignored errors but does not prevent the coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards directly prohibit ignoring exceptions and unchecked errors.
Security testing can detect missing error handling before deployment.
Secure development life cycle requires systematic error handling, reducing unchecked conditions.
Application security requirements include explicit handling of error conditions.
Secure architecture principles mandate robust exception and error management.