Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-22069

High

Published: 19 May 2026

Published
19 May 2026
Modified
19 May 2026
KEV Added
Patch
CVSS Score v3.1 7.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0011 1.3th percentile
Risk Priority 15 60% EPSS · 20% KEV · 20% CVSS

Summary

CVE-2026-22069 is a high-severity Incorrect Privilege Assignment (CWE-266) vulnerability in Oppo (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 1.3th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability details

A local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in O+ Connect because it fails to validate the identity of the caller on the pipe interface.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-22736Shared CWE-266
CVE-2026-32519Shared CWE-266
CVE-2026-33519Shared CWE-266
CVE-2025-68869Shared CWE-266
CVE-2025-50007Shared CWE-266
CVE-2026-23550Shared CWE-266
CVE-2025-69293Shared CWE-266
CVE-2026-24968Shared CWE-266
CVE-2024-43333Shared CWE-266
CVE-2026-27051Shared CWE-266

Affected Assets

Oppo
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-266

Designation of a manager and policy dissemination ensures privileges are assigned according to defined roles.

addresses: CWE-266

Regular reviews catch incorrect privilege assignments to users, roles, or processes.

addresses: CWE-266

Explicitly specifying privileges and group/role memberships for accounts reduces the risk of incorrect privilege assignments.

addresses: CWE-266

The control requires explicit definition of separated access authorizations, making incorrect privilege assignments that bundle conflicting duties harder to implement.

addresses: CWE-266

Ensures privileges are assigned only as necessary rather than incorrectly over-granted.

References