Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:LSummary
CVE-2026-31829 is a high-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Flowiseai Flowise. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 18% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as LLM Application Platforms; in the Supply Chain and Deployment risk domain.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-31829 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, classified under CWE-918, affecting Flowise versions prior to 3.0.13. Flowise is a drag-and-drop user interface for building customized large language model (LLM) flows. The issue stems from an HTTP Node exposed in AgentFlow and Chatflow components, which performs server-side HTTP requests to user-controlled URLs without restrictions on target hosts. This includes private/internal IP ranges (RFC 1918), localhost, and cloud metadata endpoints, enabling attackers to trick the server into accessing resources not reachable from the public internet. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.1 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L).
Any user interacting with a publicly exposed chatflow can exploit this vulnerability by supplying malicious URLs, requiring low privileges (PR:L) but high attack complexity (AC:H) with no user interaction needed beyond normal usage. Successful exploitation allows attackers to force the Flowise server to make unauthorized requests to internal network resources, potentially leading to high confidentiality and integrity impacts (C:H/I:H) such as data exfiltration from internal services, along with low availability impact (A:L).
The official advisory on GitHub (GHSA-fvcw-9w9r-pxc7) confirms the vulnerability is fixed in Flowise version 3.0.13, recommending immediate upgrades to mitigate the SSRF risk. No additional workarounds are specified in the provided details.
Flowise's focus on LLM flows introduces AI/ML relevance, as exploited instances could compromise internal data used in model training or inference pipelines. No real-world exploitation has been reported in the available information.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-10930
Vulnerability Data
Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.0.13, Flowise exposes an HTTP Node in AgentFlow and Chatflow that performs server-side HTTP requests using user-controlled URLs. By default, there are…
more
no restrictions on target hosts, including private/internal IP ranges (RFC 1918), localhost, or cloud metadata endpoints. This enables Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), allowing any user interacting with a publicly exposed chatflow to force the Flowise server to make requests to internal network resources that are inaccessible from the public internet. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.13.
- CWE(s)
AI Security AnalysisAI
- AI Category
- LLM Application Platforms
- Risk Domain
- Supply Chain and Deployment
- OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
- None mapped
- Classification Reason
- Matched keywords: flowise, large language model
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.3.6V1.5.3V5.3.2V10.4.7
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.
Input validation directly stops untrusted URLs from being accepted and fetched without destination checks.
Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.
Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.
Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.
Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.