Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-3274 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Tenda F453 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 42% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-3274 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the Tenda F453 router running firmware version 1.0.0.3. The flaw resides in the frmL7ProtForm function within the /goform/L7Prot endpoint of the httpd component. By manipulating the 'page' argument, an attacker can trigger the buffer overflow remotely, as classified under CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input). The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and was published on 2026-02-27.
The vulnerability can be exploited remotely by an attacker who has low privileges (PR:L), such as an authenticated user on the device. No user interaction is required, and the low attack complexity enables straightforward exploitation over the network. Successful exploitation grants high-impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability consequences, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution, data theft, or full device compromise. A public exploit has been released, increasing the risk of real-world attacks.
Advisories and references, including VulDB entries (ctiid.347998, id.347998, submit.759621) and a GitHub repository at https://github.com/Litengzheng/vul_db/blob/main/F453/vul_74/README.md, document the issue and provide exploit details. The manufacturer's site at https://www.tenda.com.cn/ is listed, though specific patch or mitigation guidance is not detailed in the available information.
Notable context includes the public availability of an exploit, which heightens the urgency for affected users to monitor for updates or apply network controls.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-8981
Vulnerability Data
A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda F453 1.0.0.3. Affected by this issue is the function frmL7ProtForm of the file /goform/L7Prot of the component httpd. Performing a manipulation of the argument page results in buffer overflow. The attack is…
more
possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.