Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:NSummary
CVE-2026-33557 is a critical-severity Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input (CWE-1285) vulnerability in Apache Kafka. Its CVSS base score is 9.1 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 49th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-33557 is a high-severity vulnerability (CVSS 3.1 score of 9.1) in Apache Kafka, stemming from the default broker property `sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class` being set to `org.apache.kafka.common.security.oauthbearer.DefaultJwtValidator`. This validator accepts any JSON Web Token (JWT) without verifying its signature, issuer, or audience, allowing improper authentication. The issue affects Apache Kafka versions 4.1.0 and 4.1.1.
A remote attacker with network access to the Kafka broker can exploit this vulnerability without privileges or user interaction by generating a custom JWT token from any issuer, setting the `preferred_username` claim to impersonate any valid user. Successful exploitation enables high confidentiality and integrity impacts, such as unauthorized access to topics, data exfiltration, or message injection, corresponding to CWE-1285 (Improper Validation of Specified Index or Position).
Apache Kafka advisories recommend that users of versions 4.1.0 and 4.1.1 explicitly configure `sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class` to `org.apache.kafka.common.security.oauthbearer.BrokerJwtValidator` as a mitigation. The vulnerability is fixed in Kafka 4.1.2, 4.2.0, and later releases, where JWT validation is properly enforced. Additional details are available in the official Kafka CVE list at https://kafka.apache.org/cve-list and related mailing list announcements.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-23846
Vulnerability Data
A possible security vulnerability has been identified in Apache Kafka. By default, the broker property `sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class` is set to `org.apache.kafka.common.security.oauthbearer.DefaultJwtValidator`. It accepts any JWT token without validating its signature, issuer, or audience. An attacker can generate a JWT token from…
more
any issuer with the `preferred_username` set to any user, and the broker will accept it. We advise the Kafka users using kafka v4.1.0 or v4.1.1 to set the config `sasl.oauthbearer.jwt.validator.class` to `org.apache.kafka.common.security.oauthbearer.BrokerJwtValidator` explicitly to avoid this vulnerability. Since Kafka v4.1.2 and v4.2.0 and later, the issue is fixed and will correctly validate the JWT token.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.4.2V2.1.1V2.2.1V2.2.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation at post-design stages directly uncovers incorrect implementations of required authentication algorithms.
Requires explicit validation of supplied indices/offsets/positions before they are used to access buffers or other indexable resources.
Requiring documented development processes, standards, and tools reduces the chance that an established authentication algorithm is coded incorrectly.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation, preventing this class of flaw at development time.
Vulnerability identification processes can discover missing index validation via scanning or reviews.
Patching and replacement can remediate instances of the weakness after discovery.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure authentication control directly requires correct implementation of authentication algorithms.
Security testing can detect missing or incorrect index validation during development and acceptance.
Cryptography control addresses proper use of authentication algorithms but is broader than authentication alone.
Secure development lifecycle includes input validation requirements that can prevent improper index handling.
Application security requirements typically mandate bounds checking and validation of offsets/indices.
Secure architecture principles include defensive input validation and bounds checking for indexable resources.