Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-7418

Memory Safety

Published
29 April 2026
Modified
30 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0056 45th percentile
Risk Priority 37 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-7418 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Process Injection (T1055); ranked at the 45th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-7418 is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the UTT HiPER 1250GW router firmware versions up to 3.2.7-210907-180535. The issue resides in the strcpy function within the route/goform/NTP file, where manipulation of the Profile argument triggers the overflow. Published on 2026-04-29, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and is associated with CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input).

Remote attackers with low privileges, such as authenticated users, can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation leads to high-impact consequences, including unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information, modification of data or system configuration, and denial of service through complete loss of availability.

Advisories from VulDB (vuln/360155) and a related GitHub repository detail the vulnerability and publicly disclose a working exploit, emphasizing remote exploitability. No specific patches or vendor mitigations are referenced in the available sources; practitioners should isolate affected devices, monitor for exploitation attempts targeting the NTP form endpoint, and pursue firmware updates from UTT if available.

The exploit's public disclosure heightens the risk of real-world attacks against exposed UTT HiPER 1250GW instances.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was determined in UTT HiPER 1250GW up to 3.2.7-210907-180535. This vulnerability affects the function strcpy of the file route/goform/NTP. Executing a manipulation of the argument Profile can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The…

more

exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1055 Process Injection Stealth
Adversaries may inject code into processes in order to evade process-based defenses as well as possibly elevate privileges.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-1864Shared CWE-119, CWE-120
CVE-2025-10169Shared CWE-119, CWE-120
CVE-2025-8246Shared CWE-119, CWE-120
CVE-2026-1328Shared CWE-119, CWE-120
CVE-2026-3275Shared CWE-119, CWE-120
CVE-2025-4451Shared CWE-119, CWE-120
CVE-2025-1147Shared CWE-119, CWE-120
CVE-2025-10942Shared CWE-119, CWE-120
CVE-2025-11293Shared CWE-119, CWE-120
CVE-2025-5634Shared CWE-119, CWE-120

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V17.3.2
  • V5.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.

Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.

Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.

Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.

ID.RA-08 partial match
prevents

Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.

PR.AT-02 partial match
prevents

Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.

prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer operations, directly eliminating CWE-119.

finds

Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.

References