Cyber Resilience

CWE · MITRE source

CWE-288Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel

Abstraction: Base · CVEs in our corpus: 591

The product requires authentication, but the product has an alternate path or channel that does not require authentication.

Last updated: 04 July 2026 00:28 UTC

Cumulative inbound coverage

How completely the frameworks we cross-walk collectively cover this — the verdict is the strongest single mapping (overlapping partials are not summed); breadth shows the corroboration behind it.

Collective: full · 14 mapping(s) from 7 framework(s): STIG rhel 7 3 (mostly) · ATT&CK 3 (partial) · STIG oracle linux 9 2 (full) · STIG oracle linux 8 2 (mostly) · ASVS 5.0 2 (partial) · OWASP-Web 1 (full) · CAPEC 1 (partial)

See the full cumulative-coverage rollup →

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

This weakness contributes to A07:2025 Authentication Failures.

NIST 800-53 r5 controls that address this weakness (6)AI

Control Title Family Why it addresses this CWE
IA-10Adaptive AuthenticationIAAdaptive requirements can apply across access paths, reducing the ability to bypass authentication via alternate channels or paths.
IA-13Identity Providers and Authorization ServersIACentralized IdPs close alternate authentication paths that enable bypass.
IA-8Identification and Authentication (Non-organizational Users)IAEnforces authentication for non-organizational users, making it harder to bypass via alternate paths or channels.
AC-17Remote AccessACAuthorizing remote access reduces the ability to bypass authentication via unauthorized alternate remote channels.
AC-9Previous Logon NotificationACUsers can identify logons via alternate paths or channels by reviewing the previous logon time.
SC-11Trusted PathSCRequires authentication to occur exclusively over the isolated trusted path, directly preventing bypass via alternate or untrusted channels.

MITRE ATT&CK techniques this weakness enables

Our own two-way CWE↔ATT&CK cross-walk — a direct mapping with no public source (the CWE→CAPEC→ATT&CK chain leaves most top weaknesses, incl. XSS and SQLi, mapped to nothing). Drafted by Grok and spot-checked by Claude Opus 4.8.

Direction: other covers this; this covers other (F/M/P = full / mostly / partial).

Top CVEs of this weakness type, ranked by Risk Priority

CVE Risk CVSS EPSS Published
CVE-2020-10148 KEV10.09.80.91982020-12-29
CVE-2023-20269 KEV10.05.00.21582023-09-06
CVE-2023-42793 KEV10.09.80.99982023-09-19
CVE-2023-46747 KEV10.09.80.96512023-10-26
CVE-2024-1709 KEV UPD10.010.00.99962024-02-21
CVE-2024-27198 KEV UPD10.09.80.99942024-03-04
CVE-2024-55591 KEV10.09.80.98262025-01-14
CVE-2025-24472 KEV10.08.10.02992025-02-11
CVE-2025-2746 KEV10.09.80.58432025-03-24
CVE-2025-2747 KEV10.09.80.92162025-03-24
CVE-2025-4427 KEV UPD10.05.30.99892025-05-13
CVE-2025-34026 KEV UPD10.07.50.83482025-05-21
CVE-2025-57819 KEV UPD10.09.80.93292025-08-28
CVE-2026-23760 KEV10.09.80.96272026-01-22
CVE-2026-24858 KEV UPD10.09.80.85842026-01-27
CVE-2026-1603 KEV10.08.60.81092026-02-10
CVE-2017-51748.09.80.52292017-05-19
CVE-2022-358698.09.80.60292022-07-25
CVE-2023-27328.09.80.67512023-05-25
CVE-2024-23917 UPD8.09.80.53732024-02-06
CVE-2024-73148.09.80.51472024-08-02
CVE-2024-109248.09.80.81722024-11-15
CVE-2024-131798.07.30.61812025-01-14
CVE-2024-563258.09.80.78672025-04-01
CVE-2017-99447.09.80.02982017-12-27