CVE-2019-25273
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2019-25273 is a high-severity Unquoted Search Path or Element (CWE-428) vulnerability in Easy Hide Ip (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked at the 4th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2019-25273 is an unquoted service path vulnerability affecting Easy-Hide-IP version 5.0.0.3, specifically in the EasyRedirect service. The service binary is installed at 'C:\Program Files\Easy-Hide-IP\rdr\EasyRedirect.exe', but the service configuration lacks quotes around the path, enabling exploitation as defined by CWE-428. This flaw has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high impact potential from local access.
Local attackers with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability by placing a malicious executable in one of the intermediate directories along the unquoted path (such as C:\Program Files\ or subfolders), which the Windows service control manager will execute instead of the legitimate binary upon service startup or restart. Successful exploitation allows arbitrary code execution, potentially leading to full privilege escalation on the affected system.
Advisories from VulnCheck and a proof-of-concept exploit on Exploit-DB (ID 47712) document the issue, with the vendor site at easy-hide-ip.com available for additional context. Specific mitigation details, such as patching the service path or updating the software, are referenced in these sources.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2019-19393
Vulnerability Data
Easy-Hide-IP 5.0.0.3 contains an unquoted service path vulnerability in the EasyRedirect service that allows local attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code. Attackers can exploit the unquoted path in 'C:\Program Files\Easy-Hide-IP\rdr\EasyRedirect.exe' to inject malicious executables and escalate privileges.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover unquoted search paths through static analysis or dynamic test cases.
Documented development standards and tools can mandate proper quoting and escaping of path elements.
Engineering principles can require safe construction and quoting of search paths and command elements.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly prevent path-handling flaws such as unquoted elements during development.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect unquoted search-path issues before deployment.
Enforcing controlled software installation can prevent unquoted search-path elements in executables and scripts.
Secure development lifecycle practices include input validation and path handling that reduce unquoted search-path weaknesses.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles require safe path construction and quoting conventions.
Secure coding standards directly mandate quoting search paths and avoiding unsafe path construction.
Change-management processes can enforce review of path-handling changes that might introduce unquoted elements.