Cyber Resilience

CVE-2020-37030

Public PoC
Published
30 January 2026
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 8.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0013 3th percentile
Risk Priority 31 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2020-37030 is a high-severity Unquoted Search Path or Element (CWE-428) vulnerability in Getoutline (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked at the 3th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Outline Service version 1.3.3 is affected by CVE-2020-37030, an unquoted service path vulnerability (CWE-428) in the Windows service binary path located at C:\Program Files (x86)\Outline. This flaw allows local users to potentially execute arbitrary code with elevated system privileges, specifically LocalSystem permissions, during service startup. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability with low complexity for local exploitation.

Local low-privileged users (PR:L) can exploit this vulnerability without user interaction by placing a malicious executable in a directory that precedes the legitimate service binary in the system's PATH search order, due to the unquoted path. Upon service startup, the injected malicious code executes with LocalSystem privileges, enabling full system compromise such as persistence, lateral movement, or data exfiltration on the affected Windows host.

Advisories and references, including those from VulnCheck detailing the unquoted service path issue and an Exploit-DB entry (exploit 48414) providing a proof-of-concept, highlight the vulnerability but do not specify patches in the available information. The official Outline site (getoutline.org) is referenced for further context on the software. Security practitioners should verify service paths, apply least privilege, and monitor for updates from the vendor.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Outline Service 1.3.3 contains an unquoted service path vulnerability that allows local users to potentially execute arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. Attackers can exploit the unquoted binary path in C:\Program Files (x86)\Outline to inject malicious code that would execute…

more

with LocalSystem permissions during service startup.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2016-20057Shared CWE-428
CVE-2025-10199Shared CWE-428
CVE-2024-22437Shared CWE-428
CVE-2026-25866Shared CWE-428
CVE-2020-37223Shared CWE-428
CVE-2020-37230Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-53984Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-24671Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-2331Shared CWE-428
CVE-2019-25307Shared CWE-428

Affected Assets

Getoutline
—
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover unquoted search paths through static analysis or dynamic test cases.

Documented development standards and tools can mandate proper quoting and escaping of path elements.

Engineering principles can require safe construction and quoting of search paths and command elements.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent path-handling flaws such as unquoted elements during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect unquoted search-path issues before deployment.

degrades

Enforcing controlled software installation can prevent unquoted search-path elements in executables and scripts.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle practices include input validation and path handling that reduce unquoted search-path weaknesses.

degrades

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require safe path construction and quoting conventions.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly mandate quoting search paths and avoiding unsafe path construction.

degrades

Change-management processes can enforce review of path-handling changes that might introduce unquoted elements.

References