CVE-2024-41147
Memory Safety in Mackron Miniaudio 0.11.21
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2024-41147 is a high-severity Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122) vulnerability in Mackron Miniaudio. Its CVSS base score is 7.7 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 50th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-41147 and published on 2025-03-04, affects the ma_dr_flac__decode_samples__lpc functionality in Miniaudio version 0.11.21. This flaw, associated with CWE-122, can be triggered by a specially crafted FLAC file, resulting in memory corruption. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.7 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity due to potential impacts on integrity and availability.
A remote attacker with no privileges or user interaction required can exploit this vulnerability over the network, though it demands high attack complexity. By providing a malicious FLAC file to an application using the affected Miniaudio component for decoding, the attacker can induce memory corruption, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution, data tampering, or denial of service.
The primary advisory from Talos Intelligence, available at https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2024-2063, documents the vulnerability in detail. Security practitioners should consult this report for technical analysis, reproduction steps, and recommended mitigations, such as updating to a patched version of Miniaudio if available.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-54201
Vulnerability Data
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the ma_dr_flac__decode_samples__lpc functionality of Miniaudio miniaudio v0.11.21. A specially crafted .flac file can lead to memory corruption. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.4.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and memory-error detectors) can discover heap overflows after they have been coded.
Input validation enforces bounds checking on data written to heap buffers, directly stopping the overflow condition from being introduced.
Security engineering principles require use of memory-safe constructs and bounds-checked allocation routines that avoid introducing heap overflows.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability of a heap overflow to execute attacker-controlled code or corrupt adjacent structures.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices directly require bounds checking and safe memory handling that prevent heap overflows.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover heap-overflow flaws but does not prevent their introduction in code.
Timely patching removes known heap-overflow instances after they exist.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect heap overflows before release.
Secure development lifecycle mandates practices that reduce the likelihood of introducing heap overflows.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory APIs that mitigate heap overflows.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safety and input-validation controls that address heap overflows.
Secure coding standards directly prescribe techniques (safe functions, bounds checks) that prevent heap-based buffer overflows.
Change management ensures controlled deployment of fixes for discovered heap-overflow vulnerabilities.