Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-11207

Memory Safety in Google Chrome ≤ 141.0.7390.54

Memory Safety
Published
06 November 2025
Modified
13 November 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0025 16th percentile
Risk Priority 50 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-11207 is a medium-severity Improper Protection of Physical Side Channels (CWE-1300) vulnerability in Google Chrome. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 16th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and PE-19 (Information Leakage) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Side-channel information leakage in Storage in Google Chrome prior to 141.0.7390.54 allowed a remote attacker to perform arbitrary read/write via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

CWE(s)
CWE-1300CWE-125

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
attack.mitre.org →
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1211 Exploitation for Stealth Stealth
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities to evade detection by hiding activity, suppressing logging, or operating within trusted or unmonitored components.
attack.mitre.org →
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-11191Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-7949Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-12036Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-5907Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11077Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-9121Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-7981Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-11279Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-12443Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-3916Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

google
chrome
≤ 141.0.7390.54

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and evaluation directly finds out-of-bounds read flaws through static analysis, fuzzing, and dynamic bounds checks.

PE-19 Information Leakage partial match

Directly requires protection against electromagnetic emanation leakage, which stops one class of the physical side-channel exposures described in CWE-1300.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Secure engineering principles require bounds checking and memory-safe constructs that stop out-of-bounds reads from being introduced.

SC-39 Process Isolation partial match

Process isolation confines the effects of an out-of-bounds read to the compromised process.

SI-10 Information Input Validation partial match

Input validation rejects malformed indices or lengths that would otherwise cause reads outside buffer bounds.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices such as bounds checking and memory-safe languages directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover instances of out-of-bounds reads after code is deployed.

PR.AA-06 partial match
prevents

Limiting physical access reduces opportunity for side-channel observation but does not address emission-protection mechanisms inside the device.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing out-of-bounds read flaws.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development and acceptance includes fuzzing and static analysis that detect out-of-bounds read defects before release.

A.7.1 Physical security perimeters partial match
mitigates

Physical perimeters can limit attacker proximity needed for side-channel capture.

A.7.2 Physical entry partial match
mitigates

Entry controls reduce opportunities for physical observation of emissions.

A.7.3 Securing offices, rooms and facilities partial match
mitigates

Securing rooms and facilities can shield equipment from side-channel probing.

A.7.4 Physical security monitoring partial match
mitigates

Monitoring deters or detects attempts to exploit physical side channels.

A.7.5 Protecting against physical and environmental threats partial match
mitigates

Protecting against physical threats can include shielding against emanation attacks.

References