CVE-2026-2944
Command Injection in Tosei-Corporation Online Store Management System 1.01
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-2944 is a medium-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Tosei-Corporation Online Store Management System. Its CVSS base score is 6.9 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 5% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-2944 is an OS command injection vulnerability in the Tosei Online Store Management System (ネット店舗管理システム) version 1.01. The flaw affects the /cgi-bin/monitor.php file within the HTTP POST Request Handler component, where manipulation of the DevId argument enables arbitrary command execution. Mapped to CWE-77 (Command Injection) and CWE-78 (OS Command Injection), it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L), indicating high severity due to its network accessibility and lack of prerequisites.
The vulnerability can be exploited remotely by unauthenticated attackers sending a specially crafted HTTP POST request with a malicious DevId value, triggering OS command injection on the server. Successful exploitation allows limited impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, such as executing arbitrary commands to gather information, modify data, or disrupt services, depending on the attacker's privileges and system configuration.
Advisories from VulDB (ctiid.347314, id.347314, submit.754579) and a GitHub issue (CVE-Hunter-Leo/CVE/issues/9) detail the vulnerability, including a publicly released exploit. No patches or vendor responses are available, as the vendor was notified early but did not reply; practitioners should isolate or decommission affected systems and monitor for anomalous POST requests to /cgi-bin/monitor.php.
Notable context includes the public availability of the exploit, increasing the risk of real-world attacks against exposed instances of this management system.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-7688
Vulnerability Data
A security flaw has been discovered in Tosei Online Store Management System ネット店舗管理システム 1.01. Affected is the function system of the file /cgi-bin/monitor.php of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument DevId results in os…
more
command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.5V1.2.8
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.
Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.
Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.
Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.
Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.
Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Hardening callouts derived
DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.
- No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-77, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.