Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-34909

Path Traversal in Ui Unifi Os Server ≤ 5.0.8

CISA KEVActive ExploitationPublic PoCPath Traversal
Published
22 May 2026
Modified
23 July 2026
KEV Added
23 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 10.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.64 99.1th percentile
Risk Priority 100 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-34909 is a critical-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Ui Unifi Os Server. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 0.9% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit a Path Traversal vulnerability found in UniFi OS devices to access files on the underlying system that could be manipulated to access an underlying account.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
23 June 2026

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-34911Same product: Ui Enterprise Fortress Gateway
CVE-2024-1708Shared CWE-22both on KEV
CVE-2021-42013Shared CWE-22both on KEV
CVE-2019-7194Shared CWE-22both on KEV
CVE-2024-41713Shared CWE-22both on KEV
CVE-2021-20123Shared CWE-22both on KEV
CVE-2019-16278Shared CWE-22both on KEV
CVE-2019-5418Shared CWE-22both on KEV
CVE-2017-12637Shared CWE-22both on KEV
CVE-2016-3976Shared CWE-22both on KEV

Affected Assets

ui
unifi os server
≤ 5.0.8
ui
unifi cloud gateway industrial firmware
≤ 5.1.12
ui
unifi dream machine firmware
≤ 5.1.12
ui
unifi dream machine pro firmware
≤ 5.1.12
ui
unifi dream machine special edition firmware
≤ 5.1.12
ui
unifi dream machine pro max firmware
≤ 5.1.12
ui
enterprise fortress gateway firmware
≤ 5.1.12
ui
unifi dream wall firmware
≤ 5.1.12
ui
unifi dream router firmware
≤ 5.1.12
ui
unifi dream router 7 firmware
≤ 5.1.12
+22 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.

References