Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-3750

SSRF in Continew Admin ≤ 4.1.0

Public PoCSSRF
Published
08 March 2026
Modified
10 March 2026
CVSS Score v4 5.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0035 28th percentile
Risk Priority 24 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-3750 is a medium-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Continew Continew Admin. Its CVSS base score is 5.1 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 28th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-3750 is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, classified under CWE-918, affecting ContiNew Admin versions up to 4.2.0. The flaw exists in the URI.create function of the file continew-system/src/main/java/top/continew/admin/system/factory/S3ClientFactory.java within the Storage Management Module.

The vulnerability enables remote exploitation by attackers who possess high privileges (PR:H), as indicated by its CVSS v3.1 base score of 4.7 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). Successful exploitation requires network access and low attack complexity but demands elevated privileges, potentially resulting in low-level impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability without changing the scope.

Advisories referenced on VulDB and a Notion page detail the public disclosure of the exploit, noting it may be actively used. The vendor was notified early regarding the issue but provided no response, and no patches or specific mitigations are mentioned in the available disclosures.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A security vulnerability has been detected in ContiNew Admin up to 4.2.0. This issue affects the function URI.create of the file continew-system/src/main/java/top/continew/admin/system/factory/S3ClientFactory.java of the component Storage Management Module. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to…

more

be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-8150Same product: Continew Continew Admin
CVE-2025-4551Same product: Continew Continew Admin
CVE-2025-4552Same product: Continew Continew Admin
CVE-2024-8155Same vendor: Continew
CVE-2025-46568Shared CWE-918
CVE-2024-51408Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-15525Shared CWE-918
CVE-2025-28089Shared CWE-918
CVE-2024-37359Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-15143Shared CWE-918

Affected Assets

continew
continew admin
≤ 4.1.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V5.3.2
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.

Input validation directly stops untrusted URLs from being accepted and fetched without destination checks.

Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.

References