Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-39983

Patrickjuchli Basic-Ftp ≤ 5.2.1

Public PoC
Published
09 April 2026
Modified
15 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
EPSS Score 0.022 81th percentile
Risk Priority 72 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-39983 is a high-severity CRLF Injection (CWE-93) vulnerability in Patrickjuchli Basic-Ftp. Its CVSS base score is 8.6 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked in the top 19% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

basic-ftp is an FTP client library for Node.js that prior to version 5.2.1 permitted FTP command injection through CRLF sequences embedded in file path arguments supplied to APIs including cd, remove, rename, uploadFrom, downloadTo, list, and removeDir. The protectWhitespace helper only stripped leading whitespace and left other inputs untouched, while FtpContext.send wrote the resulting string directly to the control socket and appended its own CRLF terminator, allowing a single call to be split into multiple FTP commands.

An attacker who can influence the path strings passed to these high-level methods can therefore inject arbitrary FTP commands against the remote server without authentication or user interaction, achieving impacts rated at CVSS 8.6 that include confidentiality loss, integrity compromise, and limited availability effects.

The vulnerability is addressed in release 5.2.1; the project published a corresponding security advisory and the fixing commit on GitHub that sanitizes path inputs before command construction.

EPSS rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.0698 on 2026-04-16 shortly after disclosure before receding to the current value of 0.0204, indicating a transient increase in exploitation interest following public release of the details.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

basic-ftp is an FTP client for Node.js. Prior to 5.2.1, basic-ftp allows FTP command injection via CRLF sequences (\r\n) in file path parameters passed to high-level path APIs such as cd(), remove(), rename(), uploadFrom(), downloadTo(), list(), and removeDir(). The library's…

more

protectWhitespace() helper only handles leading spaces and returns other paths unchanged, while FtpContext.send() writes the resulting command string directly to the control socket with \r\n appended. This lets attacker-controlled path strings split one intended FTP command into multiple commands. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.2.1.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-27699Same product: Patrickjuchli Basic-Ftp
CVE-2026-41324Same product: Patrickjuchli Basic-Ftp
CVE-2026-49130Shared CWE-93
CVE-2025-6175Shared CWE-93
CVE-2026-43968Shared CWE-93
CVE-2026-44092Shared CWE-93
CVE-2026-12357Shared CWE-93
CVE-2026-39394Shared CWE-93
CVE-2026-35601Shared CWE-93
CVE-2025-41376Shared CWE-93

Affected Assets

patrickjuchli
basic-ftp
≤ 5.2.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V4.2.4

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly stops untrusted data containing CRLF sequences from reaching the component that treats CRLF as a delimiter.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization and validation to block CRLF injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect CRLF flaws but does not itself implement the neutralization.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevents CRLF injection.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for neutralizing special characters such as CRLF in inputs.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage safe handling of untrusted data but do not prescribe specific CRLF controls.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly require neutralization of CRLF sequences, fully addressing this weakness.

References