CVE-2023-45579
Memory Safety in Dlink Di-7003G Firmware ≤ 23.08.25d1
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-45579 is a critical-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Dlink Di-7003G Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 33% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A buffer overflow vulnerability affects multiple D-Link router models, specifically DI-7003GV2.D1 versions up to 23.08.25D1, DI-7100G+V2.D1 and DI-7100GV2.D1 up to 23.08.23D1, DI-7200G+V2.D1 and DI-7200GV2.E1 up to 23.08.23E1 or 23.08.23D1, and DI-7300G+V2.D1 plus DI-7400G+V2.D1 up to 23.08.23D1. The flaw, tracked as CWE-787, resides in the jingx.asp function and is triggered by the ip/type parameter, enabling out-of-bounds writes.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted HTTP request over the network to exploit the issue, achieving arbitrary code execution with no user interaction required. The vulnerability carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8, reflecting full impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Public references consist of GitHub reports detailing the buffer overflow but provide no official vendor advisories or patch information. The associated EPSS score has remained in the 0.08–0.09 range with only minor fluctuation since disclosure.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-49871
Vulnerability Data
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in D-Link device DI-7003GV2.D1 v.23.08.25D1 and before, DI-7100G+V2.D1 v.23.08.23D1 and before, DI-7100GV2.D1 v.23.08.23D1, DI-7200G+V2.D1 v.23.08.23D1 and before, DI-7200GV2.E1 v.23.08.23E1 and before, DI-7300G+V2.D1 v.23.08.23D1, and DI-7400G+V2.D1 v.23.08.23D1 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via…
more
the ip/type parameter of the jingx.asp function.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Out-of-bounds writes that corrupt control flow or inject shellcode are rendered non-executable by the same memory protections.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.
Secure development life cycle mandates practices that prevent out-of-bounds writes.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.
Secure architecture and engineering principles reduce the likelihood of buffer overflows.
Secure coding directly addresses out-of-bounds writes through language choice and coding standards.
Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.