Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-13799

Command Injection in Adslr B-Qe2W401 Firmware ≤ 250814-r037c

Published
01 December 2025
Modified
29 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 2.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.096 95th percentile
Risk Priority 36 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-13799 is a low-severity Injection (CWE-74) vulnerability in Adslr B-Qe2W401 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 2.1 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 5% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the ADSLR NBR1005GPEV2 firmware version 250814-r037c, specifically in the ap_macfilter_del function of the /send_order.cgi endpoint. The flaw arises from improper handling of the mac argument, which can be manipulated to execute arbitrary commands. The issue is tracked under CWE-74 and CWE-77 and carries a low CVSS 4.0 score of 2.1, reflecting that it requires an authenticated remote attacker.

An authenticated attacker with network access can supply a crafted mac parameter to the affected CGI script and achieve command execution on the device. Public exploit code has been released, enabling potential remote compromise of the router without vendor interaction.

The vendor was notified prior to disclosure but provided no response or patch. Public references consist primarily of vulnerability database entries that document the issue and the submitted proof-of-concept.

EPSS for the CVE rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.0141 on 2025-12-11 before receding to the current value of 0.0027, indicating a temporary increase in exploitation interest after public disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability has been found in ADSLR NBR1005GPEV2 250814-r037c. This vulnerability affects the function ap_macfilter_del of the file /send_order.cgi. The manipulation of the argument mac leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has…

more

been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1221 Template Injection Stealth
Adversaries may create or modify references in user document templates to conceal malicious code or force authentication attempts.
T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1674 Input Injection Execution
Adversaries may simulate keystrokes on a victim’s computer by various means to perform any type of action on behalf of the user, such as launching the command interpreter using keyboard shortcuts, typing an inline script to be executed,…
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-13800Same product: Adslr B-Qe2W401
CVE-2025-13797Same product: Adslr B-Qe2W401
CVE-2025-13798Same product: Adslr B-Qe2W401
CVE-2023-31746Same vendor: Adslr
CVE-2026-1548Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-8753Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2025-10689Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2025-10960Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2024-11658Shared CWE-74, CWE-77
CVE-2026-8777Shared CWE-74, CWE-77

Affected Assets

adslr
b-qe2w401 firmware
≤ 250814-r037c

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 directly requires validation of information inputs to reject malformed or special-element content before it reaches downstream parsers.

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and output encoding that prevent injection flaws.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

finds

Security testing in development catches injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging supports detection of injection attempts but does not prevent the weakness.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify active injection attacks after they occur.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent injection flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection attacks in software design.

References